Laughter:Its basic nature and its background of equivocal impression

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When we look at laughters uttered in conversation, we can easily realize that the traditional incongruity theory has not a general validity. Moreover, laughter is often uttered in a situation where there is no playful tone. Analyzing not only speakers' but also recipients' laughter, I will point out that any laugher laughs when he is not what he is presenting or has presented as self x and is leaking a minimum hint for the others to negatively qualify his ongoing self in such a manner, i.e. he is non (x). Therefore I would define laughter as a collaborative metacommunication to avoid mutual misunderstandg about the participation stance of self. Nevertheless the message now he is not x does not specify what he is now. The equivocality of laughter derives from the basic nature of its message, the surrounding context and the availability of relevant informations. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tani, Y. (2009). Laughter:Its basic nature and its background of equivocal impression. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5447 LNAI, pp. 314–329). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00609-8_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free