A novel circadian daylight metric for building design and evaluation

104Citations
Citations of this article
294Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper extends the applicability of emerging frameworks for evaluating the non-visual effects of light through the development of a novel area-based daylighting metric addressing goals of human circadian stimulus and entrainment in buildings. Procedures using annual, climate-based daylight modeling of eye-level light exposures are developed to analyze and map indoor environments in regard to spatial and seasonal changes in the availability of a circadian-effective daylight stimulus. Because the biological effects of light exposure are not instantaneous, a novel approach is developed to assess the duration of an effective stimulus on a daily basis, as well as the frequency an effective stimulus is present over the course of a year. Results can be used to identify and visually examine building zones where long-term occupancy may lead to disruption of the circadian system in the absence of supplemental electrical lighting capable of effective circadian stimulus. The metric and visualization techniques are implemented in a parametric, simulation-based workflow utilizing publicly available software tools. The workflow can be used to assess and differentiate the performance of various daylighting strategies during the design phases of a project, or to examine existing spaces. The applicability of the workflow is demonstrated using two example models: a portable school classroom, and a generic open-plan commercial office floor plate.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Konis, K. (2017). A novel circadian daylight metric for building design and evaluation. Building and Environment, 113, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.025

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 126

64%

Researcher 42

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 77

51%

Design 36

24%

Environmental Science 21

14%

Arts and Humanities 16

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free