Outcome of transcutaneous electrical nervestimulation in chronic pain: Short-term results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

18Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of short term transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment in chronic pain with respect to pain intensity and patients-satisfaction with treatment results. We therefore performed a randomised controlled trial comparing TENS and sham TENS. Patients, researchers and therapists were blinded for treatment allocation. One hundred and sixty-three patients with chronic pain referred to the Pain Centre entered the study. Conventional TENS and sham TENS were applied in the segments of pain,for a period of ten days. Outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analogue scale) and patients' satisfaction with treatment result (yes or no). The proportions of patients satisfied with treatment result differed significantly for TENS compared to sham TENS (58 and 42.7% respectively, x2 = 3.8, p = 0.05). However, no differences in pain intensity were found for patients treated with TENS or sham TENS. Only for patients satisfied with treatment results pain intensity gradually decrease equally both for TENS and sham TENS with repeated treatment application. © Springer-Verlag Italia 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale

4414Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

3138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain

1048Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Epidural local anesthetic plus corticosteroid for the treatment of cervical brachial radicular pain: Single injection versus continuous infusion

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: Low fidelity may explain negative findings

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oosterhof, J., De Boo, T. M., Oostendorp, R. A. B., Wilder-Smith, O. H. G., & Crul, B. J. P. (2006). Outcome of transcutaneous electrical nervestimulation in chronic pain: Short-term results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Headache and Pain, 7(4), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-006-0309-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

71%

Researcher 8

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 16

28%

Neuroscience 5

9%

Psychology 4

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free