Beyond Method

0Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aristotle was, for Gadamer, a major presence within the hermeneutictradition. The distinctions Aristotle drew in his Nicomachean Ethics between different forms of reasoning were crucial in defining the nature of understanding and threw into sharp relief what Gadamer termed ‘the problem of method ’, i.e. the erroneous assumption that that methods have universal application. Gadamer argued that within the human sciences the notion of ‘method’ had been misunderstood and misapplied. Methods may have their minor uses but can never in themselves lead to understanding. Only by engaging with the particular question posed by the object of inquiry—and addressed to us in our unique situations and with our unique histories—can we begin to understand that object. In becoming educated we become more receptive to the world around us and the questions it asks of us. We become worldlier. Education is centrally concerned with enabling us to move out into the world as confident thinkers capable of acknowledging the uniqueness of the problems facing us.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nixon, J. (2017). Beyond Method. In SpringerBriefs on Key Thinkers in Education (pp. 41–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52117-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free