How Intractability Spans the Cognitive and Evolutionary Levels of Explanation

11Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The challenge of explaining how cognition can be tractably realized is widely recognized. Classical rationality is thought to be intractable due to its assumptions of optimization and/or domain generality, and proposed solutions therefore drop one or both of these assumptions. We consider three such proposals: Resource-Rationality, the Adaptive Toolbox theory, and Massive Modularity. All three seek to ensure the tractability of cognition by shifting part of the explanation from the cognitive to the evolutionary level: Evolution is responsible for producing the tractable architecture. We consider the three proposals and show that, in each case, the intractability challenge is not thereby resolved, but only relocated from the cognitive level to the evolutionary level. We explain how non-classical accounts do not currently have the upper hand on the new playing field.

References Powered by Scopus

Rational choice and the structure of the environment

3700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On aims and methods of Ethology

2898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task

1459Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive design for artificial minds

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formalizing Verbal Theories: A Tutorial by Dialogue

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rich, P., Blokpoel, M., de Haan, R., & van Rooij, I. (2020). How Intractability Spans the Cognitive and Evolutionary Levels of Explanation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12506

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

62%

Researcher 5

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

50%

Philosophy 3

21%

Neuroscience 2

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free