Impact of GDC Interlayer Microstructure on Strontium Zirconate Interphase Formation and Cell Performance

  • Golani S
  • Wankmüller F
  • Herzhof W
  • et al.
4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In solid oxide cells (SOCs) exhibiting mixed ionic-electronic conductor air electrode (MIEC AE) (e.g. La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3– δ LSC(F)), the formation of insulating zirconate interphases at the air electrode/zirconia electrolyte—interface is commonly prevented by an interlayer of doped cerium oxide. This complex interaction has a tremendous influence on cell performance, as the morphology of the interlayer determines the amount and continuity of the zirconate interphases. The performance of fuel electrode supported cells (FESCs) exhibiting gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC) interlayers fabricated from different commercially available powders are compared. All of these layers were fabricated according to the same procedure. The cell performance is analyzed by means of current-voltage (CV) characteristics, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and subsequent impedance analysis by the distribution of relaxation times (DRT). Next to the cell testing at application-oriented conditions, impedance spectra are measured over a wide temperature ranging down to 250 °C to resolve polarization phenomena related to bulk, grain boundary and interfacial effects within and in-between the gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC) and the 8 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) electrolyte. Furthermore, symmetrical air electrode (SymAE) cells are analyzed to eliminate impedance contributions from the anode layer (AL) and the substrate. The electrochemical results are correlated to the microstructural features of the GDC/YSZ interface obtained from post-test focused ion beam (FIB)/scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. This comparison revealed significant differences in the cell performance, which could be attributed to the amount and continuity of the residual strontium zirconate (SZO) interphase.

References Powered by Scopus

Evaluation and modeling of the cell resistance in anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells

599Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Method for Improving the Robustness of linear Kramers-Kronig Validity Tests

405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Combined deconvolution and CNLS fitting approach applied on the impedance response of technical Ni8YSZ cermet electrodes

373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Considering the suitability of symmetrical cell testing in developing electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells via a study of different lanthanum nickelate cathode materials

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electrochemical performance of solid oxide cells with Co-free Sr<inf>0.7</inf>Ce<inf>0.3</inf>MnO<inf>3-δ</inf>-based oxygen electrodes

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive study of phase evolution and electrochemical performance of the Sr<inf>0.98</inf>Ti<inf>0.5</inf>Fe<inf>0.5</inf>O<inf>3-δ</inf> perovskite as fuel electrode for steam electrolysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Golani, S., Wankmüller, F., Herzhof, W., Dellen, C., Menzler, N. H., & Weber, A. (2023). Impact of GDC Interlayer Microstructure on Strontium Zirconate Interphase Formation and Cell Performance. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 170(10), 104501. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/acfc2c

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 4

67%

Energy 1

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free