Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment

191Citations
Citations of this article
236Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the REAP system, users are automatically provided with texts to read targeted to their individual reading levels. To find appropriate texts, the user's vocabulary knowledge must be assessed. We describe an approach to automatically generating questions for vocabulary assessment. Traditionally, these assessments have been hand-written. Using data from WordNet, we generate 6 types of vocabulary questions. They can have several forms, including wordbank and multiple-choice. We present experimental results that suggest that these automatically-generated questions give a measure of vocabulary skill that correlates well with subject performance on independently developed humanwritten questions. In addition, strong correlations with standardized vocabulary tests point to the validity of our approach to automatic assessment of word knowledge. © 2005 Association for Computational Linguistics.

References Powered by Scopus

Automatic question generation from text - an aid to independent study

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation

557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A computer-aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic Multiple Choice Question Generation from Text: A Survey

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, J. C., Frishkoff, G. A., & Eskenazi, M. (2005). Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment. In HLT/EMNLP 2005 - Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 819–826). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220678

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 99

73%

Researcher 21

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 106

73%

Linguistics 21

14%

Psychology 12

8%

Social Sciences 7

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free