EdTech in humanitarian contexts: whose evidence base?

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study reports on the design and development of a methodological toolbox prototype for evaluating EdTech deployed in the contexts of fragility and crisis. The project adopted a bottom-up approach: training EdTech users in participatory action research approaches was followed by a comprehensive mapping of problems in the Azraq refugee camp that might be addressed through the chosen EdTech installed in a local Makerspace. Students as researchers used a developmental evaluation approach to deepen their understanding of evaluation as a concept and as a process and proceeded to match the results of their Azraq camp problem-tree analysis with evaluation questions related to the EdTech tools available in the Makerspace. The study concludes with a proposed methodological toolbox prototype, a set of approaches and processes that include research capacity building in fragile contexts, and user-led evaluation that emphasizes the notion of evaluation as a learning process driven by those designed to benefit from EdTech in fragile contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moser-Mercer, B., AlMousa, K. K., Alhaj Hussein, R. M., AlSbihe, R. K., AlGasem, A. S., Hadmoun, A. A., … AlHmoud, M. M. (2023). EdTech in humanitarian contexts: whose evidence base? Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1038476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free