Comparative cost-effectiveness of a fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination versus anticholinergics as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

16Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Relative costs and utilization-related outcomes of a fluticasone propionate 250 μg + salmeterol 50 μg combination (FSC), tiotropium bromide, and ipratropium as initial maintenance therapy in COPD have not been compared in a commercially-insured population. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study used health care claims data from January 2004 to June 2009 from a large administrative database for patients aged ≥40 years with COPD. Time-to-first COPD-related health care event beginning 30 days following therapy initiation with FSC (n = 16,684), ipratropium alone or in fixed dose combination with albuterol (n = 14,449), or tiotropium (n = 12,659) was estimated using Cox proportional hazard models that controlled for differences in patient demographic characteristics, health care utilization, and comorbidities at baseline. Mean adjusted costs and numbers of COPD-related health care encounters and prescription medication fills were compared among patients with 12 months of follow-up (FSC, n = 12,595; ipratropium, n = 10,617; tiotropium, n = 9126). Results: With FSC as the reference, risk for a COPD-related hospitalization and/or emergency department visit was significantly higher for ipratropium (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-1.79) and tiotropium (HR 1.29, CI 1.17-1.41). Mean adjusted 12-month COPD-related total health care costs were lower for FSC ($2068, standard deviation [SD] $1190) than for ipratropium ($2841, SD $1858) and tiotropium ($2408, SD $1511, both P, <0.05). Mean number of COPD-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits associated with an oral corticosteroid or antibiotic were also lower for FSC than for ipratropium and tiotropium (all P, <0.05). Conclusions: In this retrospective "real-world" observational sample of COPD patients, initiating treatment with FSC was associated with significantly better clinical and economic outcomes compared with short- and long-acting anticholinergic therapy. Consistent with the goal of preventing and reducing exacerbations advocated by global guidelines, the findings suggest that initiation of maintenance treatment with FSC may afford clinical benefits at a lower cost than anticholinergic treatment. © 2011 Dalal et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: A summary of the ATS/ERS position paper

3675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations by salmeterol/fluticasone propionate or tiotropium bromide

771Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improved health outcomes in patients with COPD during 1 yr's treatment with tiotropium

729Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cost effectiveness of pharmacological maintenance treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review of the evidence and methodological issues

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative effectiveness of drugs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol combination and tiotropium bromide among COPD patients new to these controller treatments

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dalal, A. A., Roberts, M. H., Petersen, H. V., Blanchette, C. M., & Mapel, D. W. (2011). Comparative cost-effectiveness of a fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination versus anticholinergics as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of COPD, 6(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S15455

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

57%

Researcher 18

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 29

55%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

15%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 7

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0