Understanding the precariat through labour and work

122Citations
Citations of this article
251Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article sets out a framework for analysing the globalizing labour process, arguing that the old dualisms of 'capital' versus 'labour' and 'formal sector' versus 'informal sector' are inadequate and unhelpful. It begins by making conceptual distinctions between work and labour and between labour and labour power, and goes on to identify a globalizing class structure in which a 'precariat' is emerging as a potentially transformative new mass class. Denied so-called 'labour rights' and social entitlements that went with twentieth century industrial citizenship, the growing precariat needs new systems of regulation, social protection and redistribution. These should be based on work and occupation rather than subordinated labour, will require new forms of collective action and representation, and should seek to redistribute the key assets of twenty-first century tertiary societies, including income security, control of time, financial capital and the commons.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
23Citations
57Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Standing, G. (2014). Understanding the precariat through labour and work. Development and Change, 45(5), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12120

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 127

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 18

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 14

8%

Researcher 14

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 126

72%

Arts and Humanities 23

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 9

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0