New Evidence about an Old Drug — Risk with Codeine after Adenotonsillectomy

  • Racoosin J
  • Roberson D
  • Pacanowski M
  • et al.
75Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In any field, improving performance and accountability depends on having a shared goal that unites the interests and activities of all stakeholders. In health care, however, stakeholders have myriad, often conflicting goals, including access to services, profitability, high quality, cost containment, safety, convenience, patient-centeredness, and satisfaction. Lack of clarity about goals has led to divergent approaches, gaming of the system, and slow progress in performance improvement. Achieving high value for patients must become the overarching goal of health care delivery, with value defined as the health outcomes achieved per dollar spent.(1) This goal is what matters for patients and unites . . .

References Powered by Scopus

Clinical practice guideline: Tonsillectomy in children

773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guidelines for codeine therapy in the context of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

More codeine fatalities after tonsillectomy in North American children

340Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Drug metabolism in drug discovery and development

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of the important role of cyp2d6 in pharmacogenomics

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Racoosin, J. A., Roberson, D. W., Pacanowski, M. A., & Nielsen, D. R. (2013). New Evidence about an Old Drug — Risk with Codeine after Adenotonsillectomy. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(23), 2155–2157. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1302454

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

54%

Researcher 14

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 50

75%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 9

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

7%

Psychology 3

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 167

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0