Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur

77Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective To estimate sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI examinations in patients with fractures of the proximal femur. To determine the interobserver agreement of the modalities among a senior consulting radiologist, a resident in radiology and a resident in orthopaedics surgery. Materials and methods 67 patients (27 males, 40 females, mean age 80.5) seen in the emergency room with hip pain after fall, inability to stand and a primary X-ray without fracture were evaluated with both CT and MRI. The images were analysed by a senior consulting musculoskeletal radiologist, a resident in radiology and a resident in orthopaedic surgery. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated with MRI as the golden standard. Kappa value was used to assess level of agreement in both MRI and CT finding. Results 15 fractures of the proximal femur were found (7 intertrochanteric-, 3 femoral neck and 5 fractures of the greater trochanter). Two fractures were not identified by CT and four changed fracture location. Among those, three patients underwent surgery. Sensitivity of CT was 0.87; 95% CI [0.60; 0.98]. Kappa for interobserver agreement for CT were 0.46; 95% CI [0.23; 0.76] and 0.67; 95% CI [0.42; 0.90]. For MRI 0.67; 95% CI [0.43; 0.91] and 0.69; 95% CI [0.45; 0.92]. Conclusion MRI was observed to have a higher diagnostic accuracy than CT in detecting occult fractures of the hip. Interobserver analysis showed high kappa values corresponding substantial agreement in both CT and MRI.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haubro, M., Stougaard, C., Torfing, T., & Overgaard, S. (2015). Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur. Injury, 46(8), 1557–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.006

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

66%

Researcher 6

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

58%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

22%

Engineering 9

16%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free