Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions

1.5kCitations
Citations of this article
2.0kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks are a state-of-the-art technique for sequence learning. They are less commonly applied to financial time series predictions, yet inherently suitable for this domain. We deploy LSTM networks for predicting out-of-sample directional movements for the constituent stocks of the S&P 500 from 1992 until 2015. With daily returns of 0.46 percent and a Sharpe ratio of 5.8 prior to transaction costs, we find LSTM networks to outperform memory-free classification methods, i.e., a random forest (RAF), a deep neural net (DNN), and a logistic regression classifier (LOG). The outperformance relative to the general market is very clear from 1992 to 2009, but as of 2010, excess returns seem to have been arbitraged away with LSTM profitability fluctuating around zero after transaction costs. We further unveil sources of profitability, thereby shedding light into the black box of artificial neural networks. Specifically, we find one common pattern among the stocks selected for trading – they exhibit high volatility and a short-term reversal return profile. Leveraging these findings, we are able to formalize a rules-based short-term reversal strategy that yields 0.23 percent prior to transaction costs. Further regression analysis unveils low exposure of the LSTM returns to common sources of systematic risk – also compared to the three benchmark models.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Random forests

95786Citations
29772Readers

This article is free to access.

77654Citations
26300Readers
Get full text
64134Citations
45364Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(2), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.054

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250150300450600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 540

65%

Researcher 119

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 95

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 80

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 355

47%

Engineering 159

21%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 144

19%

Business, Management and Accounting 101

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0