Examining disparities in the early adoption of Covid-19 personal mitigation across family structures

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The United States’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic has relied heavily on personal mitigation behaviors versus centralized governmental prevention strategies, especially early in the virus’s outbreak. This study examines how family structure shapes mitigation, focusing on the intersectional effects of gender, marital status, and the presence of children while accounting for differences in worry about infection from the virus. Using data from a national survey of 10,368 United States adults early in the pandemic (March 2020), survey-weighted logistic regression models show important differences in the likelihood of personal mitigation adoption across family structures. Unmarried women with children were most likely to report personal mitigation behaviors, including washing hands more frequently and avoiding social gatherings. Our findings highlight the differential impacts of the pandemic on those living in specific family circumstances.

References Powered by Scopus

An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time

7061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis

2499Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

1486Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors Affecting Adherence to Social Distancing among Adults Aged 19–44 Years: Insights from a Nationwide Survey during COVID-19 Pandemic

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, C. T., Fitzpatrick, K., Niño, M., Thelapurath, P., & Drawve, G. (2022). Examining disparities in the early adoption of Covid-19 personal mitigation across family structures. AIMS Public Health, 9(3), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022041

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

67%

Psychology 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free