Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in surface water supplies

409Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Giardia and Cryptosporidium levels were determined by using a combined immunofluorescence test for source waters of 66 surface water treatment plants in 14 states and 1 Canadian province. The results showed that cysts and oocysts were widely dispersed in the aquatic environment. Giardia spp. were detected in 81% of the raw water samples. Cryptosporidium spp. were found in 87% of the raw water locations. Overall, Giardia or Cryptosporidium spp. were detected in 97% of the raw water samples. Higher cyst and oocyst densities were associated with source waters receiving industrial or sewage effluents. Significant correlations were found between Giardia and Cryptosporidium densities and raw water quality parameters such as turbidity and total and fecal coliform levels. Statistical modeling suggests that cyst and oocyst densities could be predicted on the basis of watershed and water quality characteristics. The occurrence of high levels of Giardia cysts in raw water samples may require water utilities to apply treatment beyond that outlined in the Surface Water Treatment Rule of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A massive outbreak in milwaukee of cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply

1703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment

1218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: Transmission, detection and identification

744Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

LeChevallier, M. W., Norton, W. D., & Lee, R. G. (1991). Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in surface water supplies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57(9), 2610–2616. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.9.2610-2616.1991

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

19%

Researcher 13

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19

31%

Environmental Science 18

30%

Engineering 14

23%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0