Type of Track and Trigger system and incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational registry-based study

7Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Failure to recognise and respond to patient deterioration on hospital wards is a common cause of healthcare-related harm. If patients are not rescued and suffer a cardiac arrest as a result then only around 15% will survive. Track and Trigger systems have been introduced into the NHS to improve both identification and response to such patients. This study examines the association between the type of Track & Trigger System (TTS) (National Early Warning Score (NEWS) versus non-NEWS) and the mode of TTS (paper TTS versus electronic TTS) and incidence of in-hospital ward-based cardiac arrests (IHCA) attended by a resuscitation team. Methods: TTS type and mode was retrospectively collected at hospital level from 106 NHS acute hospitals in England between 2009 to 2015 via an organisational survey. Poisson regression and logistic regression models, adjusted for case-mix, temporal trends and seasonality were used to determine the association between TTS and hospital-level ward-based IHCA and survival rates. Results: The NEWS was introduced in England in 2012 and by 2015, three-fifths of hospitals had adopted it. One fifth of hospitals had instituted an electronic TTS by 2015. Between 2009 and 2015 the incidence of IHCA fell. Introduction or use of NEWS in a hospital was associated with a reduction of 9.4% in the rate of ward-based IHCA compared to non-NEWS systems (incidence rate ratio 0.906, p < 0.001). The use of an electronic TTS was also associated with a reduction of 9.8% in the rate of IHCA compared with paper-based TTS (incidence rate ratio 0.902, p = 0.009). There was no change in hospital survival. Conclusions: The introduction of standardised TTS and electronic TTS have the potential to reduce ward-based IHCA. This is likely to be via a range of mechanisms from early intervention to institution of treatment limits. The lack of association with survival may reflect the complexity of response to triggering of the afferent arm of the rapid response system.

References Powered by Scopus

Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial

2154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: A cluster-randomised controlled trial

1048Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death

721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association

3768Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2023 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association

2436Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence and clinical deterioration

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hogan, H., Hutchings, A., Wulff, J., Carver, C., Holdsworth, E., Nolan, J., … Black, N. (2020). Type of Track and Trigger system and incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational registry-based study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05721-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

61%

Researcher 6

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

46%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

42%

Engineering 2

8%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free