The counter-trafficking apparatus in action: who benefits from it?

10Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Based on long-term ethnographic research, including documentary research, qualitative interviews and observations made at a Portuguese shelter for “sex trafficked women,” this paper explores the counter-trafficking apparatus questioning who benefits from it. The discussion explores the contrasts between an institutional commitment to constructing this apparatus and the actuality of procedural efforts purporting to support “trafficking victims.” I argue that the higher goal of building a counter-trafficking apparatus — in itself a political objective — limits the rights of “victims,” making processes that claim to be part of their protection de facto neo-liberal anti-political exercises in reenforcing bureaucratic state power.

References Powered by Scopus

Will the real sex slave please stand up?

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking trafficking in women: Politics out of security

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beneath the master narrative: Human trafficking, myths of sexual slavery and ethnographic realities

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Feminism and Counter-Trafficking: Exploring the Transformative Potential of Contemporary Feminism in Portugal

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nigerian Migrant Women and Human Trafficking Narratives: Stereotypes, Stigma and Ethnographic Knowledge

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social Protection Programmes: Narratives of Nigerian Women and Anti-Traffcking Practitioners in Italy

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clemente, M. (2022). The counter-trafficking apparatus in action: who benefits from it? Dialectical Anthropology, 46(3), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-022-09655-8

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

30%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

73%

Psychology 2

18%

Arts and Humanities 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0