Decolonising water diplomacy and conflict transformation: from security-peace to equity-identity

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Water diplomacy and conflict transformation are dominated by an interest-based paradigm, where attention is given solely to achieving security and peace. We intend to critically challenge this paradigm - which is mainly dominated by the views of the Global North - by emphasising two other important but often overlooked elements: equity and identity. We argue that diplomacy within the contemporary paradigm is easily manipulated by the broader security and peace interests of foreign powers in a manifestation of global and regional geopolitical rivalry. We conclude that pro-security-peace water diplomacy is an inefficacious remedy, and posit instead that equity and particularly identity should be placed at the heart of water diplomacy and conflict transformation. While introducing a new alternative definition, we call for a paradigm shift, from security-peace to equity-identity orientation, to give space for the voice of the Global South in the analysis of hydropolitical relations. This approach affords additional insights into and explanations for hydropolitical patterns, and helps us to define new strategies for decolonising water diplomacy in practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagheeby, M., & Amezaga, J. (2023). Decolonising water diplomacy and conflict transformation: from security-peace to equity-identity. Water Policy, 25(8), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free