Delivering nutrition interventions to women and children in conflict settings: A systematic review

10Citations
Citations of this article
355Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Low/middle-income countries (LMICs) face triple burden of malnutrition associated with infectious diseases, and non-communicable diseases. This review aims to synthesise the available data on the delivery, coverage, and effectiveness of the nutrition programmes for conflict affected women and children living in LMICs. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases and grey literature using terms related to conflict, population, and nutrition. We searched studies on women and children receiving nutrition-specific interventions during or within five years of a conflict in LMICs. We extracted information on population, intervention, and delivery characteristics, as well as delivery barriers and facilitators. Data on intervention coverage and effectiveness were tabulated, but no meta-analysis was conducted. Results Ninety-one pubblications met our inclusion criteria. Nearly half of the publications (n=43) included population of sub-Saharan Africa (n=31) followed by Middle East and North African region. Most publications (n=58) reported on interventions targeting children under 5 years of age, and pregnant and lactating women (n=27). General food distribution (n=34), micronutrient supplementation (n=27) and nutrition assessment (n=26) were the most frequently reported interventions, with most reporting on intervention delivery to refugee populations in camp settings (n=63) and using community-based approaches. Only eight studies reported on coverage and effectiveness of intervention. Key delivery facilitators included community advocacy and social mobilisation, effective monitoring and the integration of nutrition, and other sectoral interventions and services, and barriers included insufficient resources, nutritional commodity shortages, security concerns, poor reporting, limited cooperation, and difficulty accessing and following-up of beneficiaries. Discussion Despite the focus on nutrition in conflict settings, our review highlights important information gaps. Moreover, there is very little information on coverage or effectiveness of nutrition interventions; more rigorous evaluation of effectiveness and delivery approaches is needed, including outside of camps and for preventive as well as curative nutrition interventions. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019125221.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53701Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

35769Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research

874Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Resilience actions of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) living in camp-like settings: a Northern Nigeria case study

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Food security and nutrition in refugee camps in the European Union: Development of a framework of analysis linking causes and effects

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why We Need Stricter Oversight of Research Involving Human Subjects Affected by Conflict

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, S., Padhani, Z. A., Als, D., Munyuzangabo, M., Gaffey, M. F., Ahmed, W., … Bhutta, Z. A. (2021). Delivering nutrition interventions to women and children in conflict settings: A systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004897

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2504080120160

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

64%

Researcher 14

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 27

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 22

29%

Social Sciences 22

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0