Rising donors and the new narrative of 'South-South' cooperation: What prospects for changing the landscape of development assistance programmes?

129Citations
Citations of this article
269Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article aims to provide a critical analysis of how the 'emerging donors' are redefining the structure of development cooperation in the new millennium. It offers an overview of the growing role of Brazil, China, India and South Africa in shaping the conditionally driven framework of official development cooperation. By reviewing the aid coordination mechanisms of the Southern donors, the article also seeks to provide a context for comprehending the challenges for Southern countries to systematically manage, monitor and deliver aid. It argues that the Southern donors' interest in changing the dominant conditionality driven narrative of aid has opened up the possibility for constructing a new aid paradigm that focuses more on the strategic needs of the partner countries than on advancing the ideological interests of the donor countries. However, without assuming a much greater role in providing overseas aid and without building a unified platform based on a shared development vision, Southern donors will not be able to meaningfully alter the current DAC-dominated aid architecture. © 2013 Southseries Inc.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quadir, F. (2013, March). Rising donors and the new narrative of “South-South” cooperation: What prospects for changing the landscape of development assistance programmes? Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.775788

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 131

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 19

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

7%

Researcher 13

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 145

79%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15

8%

Arts and Humanities 13

7%

Business, Management and Accounting 11

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free