Obtaining ABET student outcome satisfaction from course learning outcome data using fuzzy logic

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the approaches for obtaining the satisfaction data for ABET "Student Outcomes" (SOs) is to transform Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) satisfaction data obtained through assessment of CLOs to SO satisfaction data. Considering the fuzzy nature of metrics of CLOs and SOs, a Fuzzy Logic algorithm has been proposed to extract SO satisfaction data from the CLO satisfaction data for any given course. The membership functions for the fuzzy variables namely CLOs, SOs and CLO-SO relationship have been defined with an implementable procedure to suit the problem. A set of 24 rules form the rule base of the fuzzy logic algorithm. The algorithm has been implemented and tested in MATLAB. An application example of a real-world problem has been presented.

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications: Third Edition

3399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fuzzy set approach to the assessment of student-centered learning

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A test-sheet-generating algorithm for multiple assessment requirements

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-objective location-routing problem with simultaneous pickup and delivery for urban distribution

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Comprehensively Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm to Guarantee Particle Activity

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Data Analytics of Student Learning Outcomes Using Abet Course Files

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Imam, M. H., Tasadduq, I. A., Ahmad, A. R., & Aldosari, F. (2017). Obtaining ABET student outcome satisfaction from course learning outcome data using fuzzy logic. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3069–3081. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00705a

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

46%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

38%

Computer Science 2

25%

Engineering 2

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0