The relation of age, race, and gender to the subsite location of colerectal carcinoma

142Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Characteristics that determine the anatomic site within the colorectum where carcinoma is most likely to occur would be useful in choosing optimal modalities for cancer screening and in the study of etiology. The aim of this study was to identify any association of gender, race, or age with colerectal carcinoma in the proximal or distal colorectum. METHODS. A descriptive, population-based epidemiologic study was conducted on colerectal carcinoma (CRC) cases identified through the Illinois Tumor Registry. Among CRC patients diagnosed between 1986 and 1991, age at diagnosis (40-90 years), gender, white or African American race, and subsite of CRC location were identified. Incidence rates were determined with demographic data from the 1990 Illinois census. Logistic regression was used to identify significant subsite specific risk factors for CRC. RESULTS. During the study period, 38,931 cases of CRC occurred in Illinois among whites and African Americans between the ages of 40 and 90 years. Age, race, and gender were independently significantly associated with both proximal and distal CRC risk (P < 0.0001). The greatest risk for white males was for distal CRC, followed by the risk for African American males of developing CRC in the distal colorectum. African Americans were more likely than whites to develop proximal CRC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19), whereas whites were more likely to have distal CRC than African Americans (OR = 1.26). Regarding the development of CBC anywhere in the colorectum, male incidence rates adjusted for age and race were greater than rates for females (OR = 1.32 for proximal and 1.68 for distal). CONCLUSIONS. The division of the colorectum anatomically in these analyses at the junction of the descending and sigmoid colon, and including the rectum above the anal canal with 'distal' CRC, demonstrated a predominance of African Americans among those at risk for proximal colon carcinoma and a predominance of white males among those at risk for distal CRC; these predominances were clearer than in previous reports. These findings may have a role in the selection of optimal CRC screening strategies for each gender or racial group.

References Powered by Scopus

Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy

4155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increasing Prevalence of Overweight Among US Adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991

2441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rising Incidence of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and nGastric Cardia

2235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology

1482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colorectal cancer in African Americans

259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colorectal cancer, one entity or three

209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, R. L., Dollear, T., Freels, S., & Persky, V. (1997). The relation of age, race, and gender to the subsite location of colerectal carcinoma. Cancer, 80(2), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970715)80:2<193::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-V

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

70%

Researcher 4

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

71%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

10%

Social Sciences 2

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0