Hepatorenal index for grading liver steatosis with concomitant fibrosis

10Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Ultrasonography is widely used as the first tool to evaluate fatty liver disease, and the hepatorenal index is a semi-quantitative method that improves its performance. Fibrosis can coexist with steatosis or even replace it during disease progression. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of fibrosis on the measurement of steatosis using the hepatorenal index. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study included 89 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and in whom liver fibrosis was determined by ultrasound elastography. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to compare between the results of the sonographic hepatorenal index and the quantification of steatosis using magnetic resonance spectroscopy as well the accuracy of detecting moderate to severe steatosis using sonography in two groups of patients: (A) without advanced fibrosis and (B) with advanced fibrosis. Advanced fibrosis was defined as a shear wave speed ≥ 1.78 m/s on ultrasound elastography. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC-ROC) to detect the ability of the hepatorenal index to differentiate light from moderate to severe steatosis in both groups. Moderate to severe steatosis was defined as a fat fraction > 15% on the magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The intra-observer variability was assessed using the Bland-Altman plot. Results Among patients, the mean age was 54.6 years and 59.6% were women, 50.6% had a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2, 29.2% had moderate to severe steatosis, and 27.2% had advanced fibrosis. There was a correlation between steatosis grading by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in group A (0.73; P < 0.001), but not in Group B (0.33; P = 0.058). The AUC-ROC for detecting a steatosis fraction ≥ 15% was 0.90 and 0.74 in group A and group B, respectively. The intra-observer variability for the hepatorenal index measurements was not significant (-0.036; P = 0.242). Conclusion The hepatorenal index is not appropriate for estimating steatosis in livers with advanced fibrosis.

References Powered by Scopus

Meta-analysis: Natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity

1033Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version)

614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current and future pharmacological therapies for NAFLD/NASH

520Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Non-invasive evaluation of liver steatosis with imaging modalities: New techniques and applications

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ultrasound Methods for the Assessment of Liver Steatosis: A Critical Appraisal

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Future Is Beyond Bright: The Evolving Role of Quantitative US for Fatty Liver Disease

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stahlschmidt, F. L., Tafarel, J. R., Menini-Stahlschmidt, C. M., & Baena, C. P. (2021). Hepatorenal index for grading liver steatosis with concomitant fibrosis. PLoS ONE, 16(2 Febuary). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246837

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 56

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free