Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies

5.5kCitations
Citations of this article
2.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Presents a discussion of matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation. The objective was to specify the benefits of randomization in estimating causal effects of treatments. It is concluded that randomization should be employed whenever possible but that the use of carefully controlled nonrandomized data to estimate causal effects is a reasonable and necessary procedure in many cases. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1974 American Psychological Association.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies

8397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mediation analysis

4780Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis

3789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 999

66%

Researcher 273

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 196

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 48

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 404

39%

Social Sciences 367

36%

Mathematics 143

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 114

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
References: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free