Thoracic and diaphragmatic endometriosis: Single-institution experience using novel, broadened diagnostic criteria

21Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To describe our experience with the multidisciplinary management of both thoracic/diaphragmatic endometriosis (TED), applying a broadened definition of the “Thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES)” to define cases. Material and Methods: We present a retrospective series of consecutive patients affected by pathology-proven TED, treated at our institution, during a period of 7 years. Results: Five women were included. Two patients were referred due to catamenial chest/shoulder pain, one due to recurrent catamenial pneumothorax, and one due to new-onset diaphragmatic hernia. One patient had no thoracic symptoms, but diaphragmatic endometriosis was found during gynecologic laparoscopy for pelvic endometriosis. Endometriosis was histologically confirmed in all cases. After follow-up, all patients remain asymptomatic. Conclusion: Broadened TES criteria could increase the incidence of TED and determine better knowledge of this condition. Multidisciplinary, minimally invasive surgery is effective and safe, but should be reserved for tertiary referral centers.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larraín, D., Suárez, F., Braun, H., Chapochnick, J., Diaz, L., & Rojas, I. (2018). Thoracic and diaphragmatic endometriosis: Single-institution experience using novel, broadened diagnostic criteria. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association, 19(3), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2018.0035

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 4

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

17%

Social Sciences 2

8%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free