Trouble with gypsies in early modern England

17Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article explores the social, legal, and administrative response in Tudor and early Stuart England to people known in law as 'Egyptians' or 'counterfeit Egyptians' but commonly called 'Gypsies'. It argues that such people differed from ordinary poor vagrants in their heritage, their language, and such activities as horse dealing and fortune-telling. Elizabethan and Jacobean publications placed Gypsies on the fringes of fecklessness, criminality, and the picaresque, and established a stereotype of deceit and imposture that has not yet disappeared. Acts of Parliament in 1531, 1554, and 1563 criminalized 'Egyptians', forbidding their entry, ordering their expulsion, and eventually making them liable to the death penalty. Enforcement, however, was haphazard, and repression co-existed uneasily with growing registers of tolerance. This is a neglected topic in early modern social history, with links to international and interdisciplinary Romani studies as well as work on itinerancy, ethnicity, and marginality.

References Powered by Scopus

On the Parish?: The Micro-Politics of Poor Relief in Rural England c.1550-1750

282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The present and future of the Gypsy past

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Roma health: An overview of communicable diseases in eastern and central europe

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'Counterfeit Egyptians': The construction and implementation of a criminal identity in early modern England

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shakespeare Beyond the Green World: Drama and Ecopolitics in Jacobean Britain

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cressy, D. (2015). Trouble with gypsies in early modern England. Historical Journal, 59(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X15000278

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

88%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 7

64%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Linguistics 1

9%

Psychology 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free