A Critical Approach to Interviewing Academic Elites: Access, Trust, and Power

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To date, research on elite interviews has primarily focused on political or business settings in European and Anglo-American contexts. In this study, we examine the procedures involved in conducting elite interviews in academic settings, drawing on fieldwork with 53 senior scholars at 10 universities across five regions of northern China. We provide a detailed, critically reflective account of strategies to gain access, develop trust, and manage the power imbalance. Our account reveals the importance of the researcher’s professional identity in gaining participants’ trust and determining adequate forms of reciprocity.

References Powered by Scopus

In Search of Subjectivity—One's Own

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting

422Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strategies for conducting elite interviews

404Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effect of Empathetic Language, Direction Giving Language, and Language Proficiency on Employee Loyalty: Examining Mediating Role of Employee Trust

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Academic Research Network Management: Sociocultural Perspectives from Languages Other Than English

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2023). A Critical Approach to Interviewing Academic Elites: Access, Trust, and Power. Field Methods, 35(3), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221114226

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

50%

Decision Sciences 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free