Electrocochleography in the diagnosis of third window conditions

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is the best-known and most common presentation of so-called “third window conditions.” There are a variety of diagnostic measures and tests for this condition in the current literature, including air-bone gap, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, and electrocochleography (EcochG). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic utility of EcochG and its relationship to air-bone gap in a cohort of patients with confirmed SSCD. Methods: We reviewed data from 20 patients (11 female and 9 male subjects, age ranging 21–78 years), with confirmed unilateral or bilateral superior canal dehiscence. In total, 11 patients had unilateral SSCD and 9 patients had bilateral SSCD as determined by high-resolution CT scan. This resulted in the inclusion of twenty-nine ears with superior canal dehiscence and 11 normal ears. Results: Our results indicated that all confirmed SSCD ears presented with an abnormal EcochG SP/AP value and that there was a statistically significant difference between normal and dehiscent ears. There was no statistically significant relationship between air-bone gap and SP/AP ratio in the ears diagnosed with SSCD nor was there a significant difference between dehiscent and normal ears in terms of air-bone gap at three frequencies. Discussion: These results are consistent with previous studies showing the diagnostic utility of EcochG for this condition and the variability of air-bone gap. While an unexpected air-bone gap continues to be a red flag for SSCD, its absence along with the presence of subjective symptoms is a reasonable indicator for further clinical investigation to include EcochG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kileny, P. R., Cherry, M. M., & McCaslin, D. L. (2023). Electrocochleography in the diagnosis of third window conditions. Frontiers in Neurology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1263513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free