Comments on the nonpharmaceutical interventions in New York City and Chicago during the 1918 flu pandemic

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This commentary was originally published in CIDRAP News and it is here reported almost verbatim to allow divulgation through open access. The Editorial summarizes John Barry's concerns about the value of accurate historical reporting and its implications in public policy determination. This short abstract was written by the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Translational Medicine to introduce the Editorial. © 2007 Barry; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic

551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The site of origin of the 1918 influenza pandemic and its public health implications

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic [2]

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cross-protection between successive waves of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic: Epidemiological evidence from US Army camps and from Britain

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transmissibility of the 1918 pandemic influenza in montreal and winnipeg of Canada

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social distancing and influenza mortality in 1918 did not increase suicide rates in the United States

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barry, J. M. (2007, December 11). Comments on the nonpharmaceutical interventions in New York City and Chicago during the 1918 flu pandemic. Journal of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-5-65

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘2100.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

43%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0