Skip to main content
Article

How we can make the trophy hunting debate less fraught

Nature Human Behaviour
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01488-3
6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

References Powered by Scopus

Cecil: A moment or a movement? Analysis of media coverage of the death of a lion, Panthera Leo

Animals
112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotions and the Ethics of Consequence in Conservation Decisions: Lessons from Cecil the Lion

Conservation Letters
95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Life after Cecil: channelling global outrage into funding for conservation in Africa

Conservation Letters
82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trophy hunting is not one big thing

Biodiversity and Conservation
4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public perceptions of trophy hunting are pragmatic, not dogmatic

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opportunities for Emotion Research on Biodiversity

Emotion Review
2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mkono, M. (2023, January 1). How we can make the trophy hunting debate less fraught. Nature Human Behaviour. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01488-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

67%

Environmental Science 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free