Losses tune differently than gains: how gains and losses shape attentional scope and influence goal pursuit

7Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Research on the asymmetric effect of negative versus positive affective states (induced by gains or losses) on scope of attention, both at a perceptual and a conceptual level, is abundant. However, little is known about the moderating effect of anticipating gains or losses versus actually experiencing them and about any downstream consequences of these effects on goal-directed behaviour. In two studies, we show that gains versus losses induce qualitatively different processes. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that the anticipation of monetary gains results in a narrowing of attentional scope, while experiencing gains broadens the scope of attention. We find the reverse pattern concerning monetary losses–while anticipation of monetary losses results in broadening of attentional scope, the actual experience of losses results in narrowing of attentional scope. Additionally, Experiment 2 replicates these findings and shows how differential attentional tuning as a function of the anticipation versus experience of gains versus losses modulates priming-induced goal-directed behaviour.

References Powered by Scopus

The theory of planned behavior

59652Citations
79840Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Bad Is Stronger Than Good

5793Citations
2342Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadowski, S., Fennis, B. M., & van Ittersum, K. (2020). Losses tune differently than gains: how gains and losses shape attentional scope and influence goal pursuit. Cognition and Emotion, 34(7), 1439–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1760214

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 5

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 11

73%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0