Long-term spinal cord stimulation modifies canine intrinsic cardiac neuronal properties and ganglionic transmission during high-frequency repetitive activation

9Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Long-term spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applied to cranial thoracic SC segments exerts antiarrhythmic and cardioprotective actions in the canine heart in situ. We hypothesized that remodeling of intrinsic cardiac neuronal and synaptic properties occur in canines subjected to long-term SCS, specifically that synaptic efficacy may be preferentially facilitated at high presynaptic nerve stimulation frequencies. Animals subjected to continuous SCS for 5–8 weeks (long-term SCS: n = 17) or for 1 h (acute SCS: n = 4) were compared with corresponding control animals (long-term: n = 15, acute: n = 4). At termination, animals were anesthetized, the heart was excised and neurones from the right atrial ganglionated plexus were identified and studied in vitro using standard intracellular microelectrode technique. Main findings were as follows: (1) a significant reduction in whole cell membrane input resistance and acceleration of the course of AHP decay identified among phasic neurones from long-term SCS compared with controls, (2) significantly more robust synaptic transmission to rundown in long-term SCS during high-frequency (10–40 Hz) presynaptic nerve stimulation while recording from either phasic or accommodating postsynaptic neurones; this was associated with significantly greater posttrain excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) numbers in long-term SCS than control, and (3) synaptic efficacy was significantly decreased by atropine in both groups. Such changes did not occur in acute SCS. In conclusion, modification of intrinsic cardiac neuronal properties and facilitation of synaptic transmission at high stimulation frequency in long-term SCS could improve physiologically modulated vagal inputs to the heart.

Figures

  • Figure 1. (A) Measurement of action potential (AP) and afterhyperpolarization (AHP) properties illustrated in an AP elicited by intracellular injection of a current pulse (0.5 nA, 5 msec): resting membrane potential (RMP), voltage displacement from RMP to AP threshold (DVt), AP and AHP amplitude (APampl, AHPampl) and duration (APdur, AHPdur); the time course of AHP decay was measured as the surface area between the AHP voltage curve and RMP (gray shading) over a specified time interval (here, from peak AHPampl to 250 msec). In this panel and in subsequent examples of individual neurones, the experiment and cell identification numbers are indicated in the lower right hand corner. (B) Classification of neurones as phasic (left) or accommodating (right) on the basis of AP firing limited to, or extending beyond the first 100 msec of a 1-sec intracellular depolarizing pulse, respectively. Left hand panel: typically, a single AP was elicited in a phasic neurone at maximal current of 1 nA, whereas 11 APs spanning a 460 msec interval were elicited at 0.6 nA in an accommodating cell. (C) Example of presynaptic nerve stimulation in which successive trains of stimuli were applied at increasing frequency (here: 20 and 30 Hz, with a 20-sec interval between trains) while recording intracellularly from a postsynaptic neurone. Upper tracing: original intracellular recording; lower: magnified tracing with DC removed and median 5 msec filtering to determine the number and amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) following the stimulus train. EPSP numbers were counted as the number of deflections that exceeded a threshold of 4SD of the baseline noise around the RMP in any given neurone (here: horizontal line drawn at 0.52 mV).
  • Table 1. Membrane properties and regenerative responses to intracellular current injection.
  • Figure 2. Modification of the time course of AHP decay in phasic neurones from the long-term SCS group. (A) Superimposed action potential (AP) recordings from individual phasic neurones in preparations from long-term SCS (upper trace) and control (lower trace); APs evoked by intracellular pulse stimulation are shown superimposed, with their respective resting membrane potentials normalized to 0 potential on the ordinate axis (dotted horizontal line). Note that the surface area of AHP decay was smaller in the SCS than in the control recording. AHP durations differed accordingly (SCS: AHPdur = 22 msec, compared with control: 32 msec). (B) Main curves – phasic neurones: summated AP recordings from long-term SCS (upper trace: mean of n = 100 cells, upward SD) and superimposed summated recordings from controls (lower trace: mean of n = 76 cells, downward SD). The time course of AHP decay surface area (measured up to 250 msec) was significantly smaller in the long-term SCS than in controls. Insetaccommodating neurones had similar AHP decay surface area values in SCS and control; same presentation as for main curves.
  • Figure 3. Representative examples of postsynaptic responses to repetitive presynaptic nerve stimulation in control and long-term SCS. (A) Intracellular recording from a representative accommodating neurone of the control group illustrates that one-to-one orthodromic transmission (presynaptic pulse number / postsynaptic action potential number) occurred at low repetitive stimulation frequency (10/10 at 2 Hz) whereas synaptic efficacy decreased at high nerve stimulation frequencies (43/100 at 20 Hz and 13/100 at 50 Hz). (B) In a representative example from the long-term SCS group, synaptic efficacy was more robust than control at high presynaptic nerve stimulation frequencies: 92/100 at 20 Hz, and 37/100 at 50 Hz.
  • Figure 4. Differential improvement of synaptic efficacy at high presynaptic nerve stimulation frequencies and increased occurrence of spontaneous EPSPs in long-term SCS versus control. (A) Cumulative data (n = 52 control and 67 long-term SCS neurones) illustrating synaptic efficacy (ordinate) measured as % of presynaptically applied pulses that elicited postsynaptic action potentials, as a function of presynaptic nerve stimulation frequency plotted on logarithmic scale (abscissa). Synaptic efficacy shown for phasic and accommodating neurones in control and long-term SCS was significantly reduced at increasing frequency, with the greatest reduction occurring among accommodating neurones of the control group. (B) Combining cell types (phasic+accom.) in each group, synaptic efficacy was significantly more robust at high nerve stimulation frequency in long-term SCS than control. (C) The number (n: main curves) and summed amplitude (inset) of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) occurring spontaneously following presynaptic nerve stimulation trains (post-train) increased at stimulus frequency >20 Hz. Post-train EPSP numbers were significantly higher in long-term SCS than control at frequencies >20 Hz. For panels (A, B and C): data are mean SD, *P < 0.05, #marginally significant, P = 0.06.
  • Figure 5. Inhibition of synaptic transmission by atropine. (A) Synaptic efficacy (ordinate) was measured as % of presynaptically applied pulses that elicited a postsynaptic action potential, as a function of presynaptic nerve stimulation frequency plotted on a logarithmic scale (abscissa). Synaptic efficacy is shown for neurones (cell types combined) in the control group (n = 18, circles) and long-term SCS group (n = 27, squares) in basal states (baseline: clear symbols) and during exposure to atropine 10 lmol/L (dark symbols). B. The curves illustrate that atropine produced a statistically significant (P < 0.001) reduction in synaptic efficacy in the two groups combined (Control + long-term SCS); clear circles: baseline; dark circles: atropine. Panels A and B: data are mean SD.
  • Figure 6. Differential effects of atropine on the time course of AHP decay following presynpatic nerve stimulation in control versus long-term SCS. In both panels, AHP decay surface areas were estimated from the AHP following the last AP of each stimulus train. (A) The time course of AHP decay was faster at low presynaptic nerve stimulation frequencies in preparations from long-term SCS (n = 47) compared to control (n = 24) (*P < 0.05, #marginally significant, P = 0.06). (B). In a subgroup of preparations that was exposed to atropine (control, n = 19; SCS, n = 6), atropine (10 lmol/L) induced a prolongation of the time course of AHP decay across all frequencies in neurones from control but not among those from long-term SCS. Data are mean SD.
  • Figure 7. Effects of XE991 on neuronal excitability in control and long-term SCS. Number of action potentials (AP) induced by 1-sec intracellular current pulses injected at 26 sec intervals during XE991 (3 lmol/L) superfusion increased from a single AP in most cells in basal states to a mean of 17 11 APs in neurones from the control group (n = 7) and to 9 8 APs in long-term SCS (n = 5) at peak XE991 effect. Upper traces show representative examples from the control group at early and later times during XE991 superfusion. Excitability measurements were interrupted between 300 and 580 sec.

References Powered by Scopus

Muscarinic suppression of a novel voltage-sensitive K<sup>+</sup> current in a vertebrate neurone [18]

1065Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: Implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in the nervous system: Some functions and mechanisms

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The sympathetic innervation of the heart: Important new insights

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of refractory angina: An update

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cardiac Electrophysiological Effects of Light-Activated Chloride Channels

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, F. M., Vermeulen, M., & Cardinal, R. (2016). Long-term spinal cord stimulation modifies canine intrinsic cardiac neuronal properties and ganglionic transmission during high-frequency repetitive activation. Physiological Reports, 4(13). https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12855

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

69%

Researcher 5

31%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 8

53%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

27%

Engineering 2

13%

Design 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0