Generalization Pattern's Strategy of Junior High School students based on Gender

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the Generalisation Patterns Strategy of junior high school students based on gender. The subject of this study is two junior high school students in Makassar City, one male, and one female. Data collection techniques are written tests and interviews which used to obtain data about the strategy of the generalization patterns of students. The validity used time triangulation. The analysis data consists of three stages: reducing data, presenting data, and daring conclusions. The results of this study show that the male subject used the strategy of Counting, Whole-object-No Adjustment, and Difference-Rate Adjustment. Meanwhile, the female subject used the strategy of Countin and Explicit in the generalization of patterns on numbers and pictures.

References Powered by Scopus

Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Algebraic generalisation strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Number pattern generalization process by provincial mathematics olympiad winner students

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring the combinatorial reasoning of high school students with reflective and impulsive cognitive style in solving problems

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2019). Generalization Pattern’s Strategy of Junior High School students based on Gender. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1417). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012045

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 3

43%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 4

57%

Physics and Astronomy 1

14%

Environmental Science 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0