Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

26Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mental health problems in the workplace are common and have a considerable impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Mental ill-health costs employers between £33 billion and £42 billion a year. According to a 2020 HSE report, roughly 2,440 per 100,000 workers in the UK were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety, resulting in an estimated 17.9 million working days lost. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of tailored digital health interventions provided in the workplace aiming to improve mental health, presenteeism and absenteeism of employees. We searched several databases for RCTs published from 2000 onwards. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures, narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings. Seven RCTs (eight publications) were included that evaluated tailored digital interventions versus waiting list control or usual care to improve physical and mental health outcomes and work productivity. The results are promising to the advantage of tailored digital interventions regarding presenteeism, sleep, stress levels, and physical symptoms related to somatisation; but less for addressing depression, anxiety, and absenteeism. Even though tailored digital interventions did not reduce anxiety and depression in the general working population, they significantly reduced depression and anxiety in employees with higher levels of psychological distress. Tailored digital interventions seem more effective in employees with higher levels of distress, presenteeism or absenteeism than in the general working population. There was high heterogeneity in outcome measures, especially for work productivity; this should be a focus of attention in future studies.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global measure of perceived stress.

22498Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

12336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Personalization strategies in digital mental health interventions: a systematic review and conceptual framework for depressive symptoms

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Precision prevention in worksite health–A scoping review on research trends and gaps

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use of digital health technology to provide mental health services for employees in Japan

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moe-Byrne, T., Shepherd, J., Merecz-Kot, D., Sinokki, M., Naumanen, P., Hakkaart-Van Roijen, L., & Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, C. (2022). Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PLOS Digital Health, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

54%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

25%

Researcher 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

37%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

21%

Social Sciences 4

21%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

21%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free