CAGE, RAPS4, RAPS4-QF and AUDIT screening tests for men and women admitted for acute alcohol intoxication to an emergency department: Are standard thresholds appropriate?

21Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: A number of screening instruments are routinely used in Emergency Department (ED) situations to identify alcohol-use disorders (AUD). We wished to study the psychometric features, particularly concerning optimal thresholds scores (TSs), of four assessment scales frequently used to screen for abuse and/or dependence, the cut-down annoyed guilty eye-opener (CAGE), Rapid Alcohol Problem Screen 4 (RAPS4), RAPS4-quantity-frequency and AUD Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaires, particularly in the sub-group of people admitted for acute alcohol intoxication (AAI). Methods: All included patients [AAI admitted to ED (blood alcohol level ≥0.8 g/l)] were assessed by the four scales, and with a gold standard (alcohol dependence/abuse section of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), to determine AUD status. To investigate the TSs of the scales, we used Youden's index, efficiency, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve techniques and quality ROC curve technique for optimized TS (indices of quality). Results: A total of 164 persons (122 males, 42 females) were included in the study. Nineteen (11.60%) were identified as alcohol abusers alone and 128 (78.1%) as alcohol dependents (DSM-IV). Results suggest a statistically significant difference between men and women (P < 0.05) in performance of the screening tests RAPS4 (≥1) and CAGE (≥2) for detecting abuse. Also, in this population, we show an increase in TSs of RAPS4 (≥2) and CAGE (≥3) for detecting dependence compared with those typically accepted in non-intoxicated individuals. The AUDIT test demonstrates good performance for detecting alcohol abuse and/ or alcohol-dependent patients (≥7 for women and ≥12 for men) and for distinguishing alcohol dependence (≥11 for women and ≥14 for men) from other conditions. Conclusion: Our study underscores for the first time the need to adapt, taking into account gender, the thresholds of tests typically used for detection of abuse and dependence in this population. © The Author 2012. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption‐II

10716Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines

4560Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detecting Alcoholism: The CAGE Questionnaire

3859Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Binge drinking in Spain, 2008-2010

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Main and interactive effects of depression and posttraumatic stress in relation to alcohol dependence among urban male firefighters

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Associations between problem gambling, socio-demographics, mental health factors and gambling type: Sex differences among Finnish gamblers

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geneste, J., Pereira, B., Arnaud, B., Christol, N., Liotier, J., Blanc, O., … Brousse, G. (2012). CAGE, RAPS4, RAPS4-QF and AUDIT screening tests for men and women admitted for acute alcohol intoxication to an emergency department: Are standard thresholds appropriate? Alcohol and Alcoholism, 47(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/ags027

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

71%

Researcher 7

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

74%

Psychology 6

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 21

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0