(Re)validating cognitive introductory computing instruments

24Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cognitive tests have been long used as a measure of student knowledge, ability, and as a predictor for success in engineering and computer science. However, these tests are not without their own problems relating to priming, difficulty (resulting in test fatigue) and time on exam. This paper discusses efforts to modify Parker et al.'s Second CS1 aptitude test (SCS1) [13] to reduce the time spent on the exam, provide greater customization to match concepts taught across three universities, and reduce redundancy of test questions all while maintaining the instrument's reliability. This instrument was modified for use on an ongoing grant investigating whether spatial abilities impact the success of students in introductory CS courses. The instrument developed in this paper is a revised shortened version of Second Computer Science 1 (SCS1) aptitude test, designated as SCS1R.

Author supplied keywords

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Can Students' Spatial Skills Predict Their Programming Abilities?

30Citations
47Readers
Get full text

A cs1 spatial skills intervention and the impact on introductory programming abilities

27Citations
39Readers

Exploring the value of student self-evaluation in introductory programming

19Citations
43Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bockmon, R., Gratch, J., Cooper, S., & Dorodchi, M. (2019). (Re)validating cognitive introductory computing instruments. In SIGCSE 2019 - Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 552–557). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287372

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Researcher 2

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

64%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Chemistry 1

9%

Arts and Humanities 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0