Validation of the clinical frailty score (CFS) in French language

40Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Very old critical ill patients are a rapid expanding group. To better understand the magnitude of the challenges involved in intensive care practice for an ageing population and discuss a rational allocation of resources, healthcare practitioners need a reliable evaluation of frailty. In order to promote the adequate use of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in a wider panel of countries, we aimed to develop, validate and characterise a French (FR) version from the original English (EN) CFS. Methods: We included participants recruited prospectively for the observational "The very old intensive care patient: A multinational prospective observation study"(VIP Study) at Geneva University Hospitals (FR speaking hospital). A FR version of the CFS was obtained by translation (EN- > FR) and back translation (FR- > EN). The final CFS-FR was then evaluated twice on the same participants with at least a 2-week interval by FR-speaking doctors and nurses. Results: Inter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93) between doctors for the original CFS version and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.57-0.87) between nurses for the FR version. Inter-rater variability between doctor and nurse was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.56-0.87) for the original version, and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.52-0.85) for the FR version. Test-retest (stability) with the original vs the FR version was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.72-0.93) for doctors and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93) for nurses. Differences between the evaluations of the CFS-EN and CSF-FR were not different from 0, with a mean difference of 0.06 (95%CI -0.24, 0.36) for the EN version and - 0.03 (95%CI -0.47, 0.41) for the FR version. Average original version ratings were slightly lower than FR version ratings, though this difference did not reach significance: -0.29 (95%CI -0.54, 0.04). Conclusion: In this prospective cohort of very old intensive care participants we developed and tested the basic psychometric properties (internal consistency, reproducibility) of a French version of the CFS. This manuscript provides clinically meaningful psychometric properties that have not been previously reported in any other language, including in the original EN version. The French cultural adaptation of this CFS has adequate psychometric properties for doctors or nurses to evaluate frailty in very old intensive care patients.

References Powered by Scopus

Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology

7238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frailty in elderly people

6589Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people

6142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between Clinical Frailty Scale score and hospital mortality in adult patients with COVID-19 (COMET): an international, multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abraham, P., Courvoisier, D. S., Annweiler, C., Lenoir, C., Millien, T., Dalmaz, F., … Bollen Pinto, B. (2019). Validation of the clinical frailty score (CFS) in French language. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1315-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 6

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

72%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

19%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

6%

Materials Science 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 31

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free