Design of hairpin ribozyme variants with improved activity for poorly processed substrates

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Application of ribozymes for knockdown of RNA targets requires the identification of suitable target sites according to the consensus sequence. For the hairpin ribozyme, this was originally defined as Y-2N -1*G+1U+2Y+3B+4, with Y = U or C, and B = U, C or G, and C being the preferred nucleobase at positions -2 and +4. In the context of development of ribozymes for destruction of an oncogenic mRNA, we have designed ribozyme variants that efficiently process RNA substrates at U-2G-1*G +1U+2A+3A+4 sites. Substrates with G-1*G+1U+2A+3 sites were previously shown to be processed by the wild-type hairpin ribozyme. However, our study demonstrates that, in the specific sequence context of the substrate studied herein, compensatory base changes in the ribozyme improve activity for cleavage (eight-fold) and ligation (100-fold). In particular, we show that A+3 and A+4 are well tolerated if compensatory mutations are made at positions 6 and 7 of the ribozyme strand. Adenine at position +4 is neutralized by G6→U, owing to restoration of a Watson-Crick base pair in helix 1. In this ribozyme-substrate complex, adenine at position +3 is also tolerated, with a slightly decreased cleavage rate. Additional substitution of A7 with uracil doubled the cleavage rate and restored ligation, which was lost in variants with A7, C7 and G7. The ability to cleave, in conjunction with the inability to ligate RNA, makes these ribozyme variants particularly suitable candidates for RNA destruction. © 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 FEBS.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drude, I., Strahl, A., Galla, D., Müller, O., & Müller, S. (2011). Design of hairpin ribozyme variants with improved activity for poorly processed substrates. FEBS Journal, 278(4), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07983.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

55%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

25%

Chemistry 2

17%

Computer Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free