Longitudinal study of cancer-related fatigue in patients with colorectal cancer

8Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Dynamic changes of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among hospitalized patients with colorectal cancer were determined. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal, descriptive study involved 96 hospitalized patients with colorectal cancer, all recruited from a tertiary general hospital in Guangzhou, China. Patients completed questionnaires three times to assess the degree of fatigue, and measurement points were within one week of admission, at 2 to 3 days after surgery and 3 weeks after surgery. Results: Significant differences among the three measurement points (p<0.01) were observed. The scores of fatigue in the second survey were the highest, followed by the third and first surveys. Colon cancer patient scores were higher than those of rectal cancer patients with a significant difference (p<0.05). Colorectal patients experienced different degrees of fatigue at different periods during hospitalization. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of interventions that are carefully tailored to patients based on the characteristics at different periods to alleviate fatigue.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Symptom Experiences in Colorectal Cancer Survivors after Cancer Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of life and psychological well-being of colorectal cancer survivors in Jordan

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Depression, Fatigue, and QoL in Colorectal Cancer Patients During and After Treatment

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, S. X., Liu, B. B., & Lu, J. H. (2014). Longitudinal study of cancer-related fatigue in patients with colorectal cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15(7), 3029–3033. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.7.3029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Researcher 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

61%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

28%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Sports and Recreations 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free