Novel treatment strategy for management of traumatic bulbar urethral rupture using temporary urethral stent after primary realignment; retrospective comparison between thermo-expandable urethral stent and self-expandable polymer-coated urethral stent

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A variety of retrievable and other types of temporarily placed stents are currently being used. However, only a few studies have considered primary endoscopic realignment with temporary urethral stent insertion in the event of traumatic bulbar urethral injury. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and complications between thermo-expandable urethral stents and polymer-coated bulbar urethral stents (BUSs) for the treatment of traumatic bulbar urethral strictures. Between September 2011 and March 2018, 30 patients who had been diagnosed with complete bulbar urethral rupture following blunt trauma underwent temporary urethral stent placement after primary realignment. Thermo-expandable nickel-titanium alloy urethral stents were placed for 15 patients (group M), and retrievable self-expandable polymer-coated BUSs were placed for another 15 patients (group A). All stents were removed within 6 months after placement. The complications and maintained patency rates were compared between the two groups. The mean stent indwelling period was 5.0 ± 2.5 months in group M and 4.9 ± 4.0 months in group A. Both groups maintained high patency rates (Group M 12/15 (80.0%) and group A 13/15 (86.7%)). Five patients who developed urethral stricture underwent direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU), and no patients required repeat DVIU or open surgical urethroplasty. Both groups maintained the mean maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) at 12 months after stent removal. Discomfort (46.7% vs. 6.7%), granulation tissue formation (73.3% vs. 26.7%) and post-void dribbling (80.0% vs. 20.0%) were more frequent in group M than in group A (p = 0.013, p = 0.011 and p = 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, both stents were effective for managing traumatic complete bulbar urethral rupture after primary realignment. However, the thermo-expandable urethral stents had a higher complication rate while the stent was in situ than the BUSs.

References Powered by Scopus

Urotrauma: AUA guideline

398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consensus statement on urethral trauma

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

British Association of Urological Surgeons' suprapubic catheter practice guidelines

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of Selected Properties of Sodium Alginate-Based Hydrogel Material—Mechanical Strength, μDIC Analysis and Degradation

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preparation and Properties of Shape Memory PEG/IEM Resin and Its Composite Designed for Ureter Stent

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bulbar Urethral Stents for Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Long-Term Follow-Up after Stent Removal

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahn, S. T., Lee, D. H., Kim, J. W., & Moon, D. G. (2020). Novel treatment strategy for management of traumatic bulbar urethral rupture using temporary urethral stent after primary realignment; retrospective comparison between thermo-expandable urethral stent and self-expandable polymer-coated urethral stent. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051274

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

80%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free