Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility

1.3kCitations
Citations of this article
413Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How do we reflect upon ourselves and our concerns in relation to society, and vice versa? Human reflexivity works through ‘internal conversations’ using language, but also emotions, sensations and images. Most people acknowledge this ‘inner-dialogue’ and can report upon it. However, little research has been conducted on ‘internal conversations’ and how they mediate between our ultimate concerns and the social contexts we confront. Margaret Archer argues that reflexivity is progressively replacing routine action in late modernity, shaping how ordinary people make their way through the world. Using interviewees' life and work histories, she shows how ‘internal conversations’ guide the occupations people seek, keep or quit; their stances towards structural constraints and enablements; and their resulting patterns of social mobility.

References Powered by Scopus

Structure, agency and the internal conversation

1883Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions

951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus

318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The body and social theory

2765Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a new epistemology of the urban?

1073Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life

886Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility (pp. 1–343). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 191

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 44

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 42

13%

Researcher 41

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 196

73%

Business, Management and Accounting 40

15%

Arts and Humanities 23

9%

Psychology 11

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0