The Human Rights of Women and Girls with Disabilities: Sterilization and Other Coercive Responses to Menstruation

15Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Steele and Goldblatt argue that menstruation is a key site for discrimination and violence against women and girls with disabilities and that the law has been complicit in sustaining these injustices. The authors make this argument by exploring the law as it relates to sterilization and provide an overview of some of the legal dimensions of menstruation in relation to women and girls with disabilities. The authors offer Australia as a case study of the human rights challenges for this population. The study concludes with a call for critical menstruation studies scholarship to engage with the legal dimensions of menstruation in relation to women and girls with disabilities and consider how mainstream menstruation activism can address this population’s experiences and needs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steele, L., & Goldblatt, B. (2020). The Human Rights of Women and Girls with Disabilities: Sterilization and Other Coercive Responses to Menstruation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies (pp. 77–91). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free