Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach

31.7kCitations
Citations of this article
9.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we provide guidance for substantive researchers on the use of structural equation modeling in practice for theory testing and development. We present a comprehensive, two-step modeling approach that employs a series of nested models and sequential chi-square difference tests. We discuss the comparative advantages of this approach over a one-step approach. Considerations in specification, assessment of fit, and respecification of measurement models using confirmatory factor analysis are reviewed. As background to the two-step approach, the distinction between exploratory and confirmatory analysis, the distinction between complementary approaches for theory testing versus predictive application, and some developments in estimation methods also are discussed.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

21326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet

15190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex "Frontal Lobe" Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis

11436Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3842

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 709

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 696

12%

Researcher 609

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2917

61%

Social Sciences 853

18%

Psychology 649

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 361

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 17
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free