Toward a Harm-Based Account of Microaggressions

33Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we critique the dominant understanding of microaggressions introduced by Derald Wing Sue and his colleagues—what we call the act-based account of microaggressions—by identifying its theoretical and practical shortcomings. On the basis of this critique, we introduce and defend an alternative, ameliorative account of microaggressions, what we call the harm-based account of microaggressions. Instead of understanding microaggressions on the basis of the acts committed by the microaggressing agent, we call for a reorientation of the concept so that the recipients of microaggressions and the harms they experience become the focal point.

References Powered by Scopus

Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing

5892Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice

3711Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination

1164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Microaggressions, Everyday Discrimination, Workplace Incivilities, and Other Subtle Slights at Work: A Meta-Synthesis

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racial Microaggressions: Critical Questions, State of the Science, and New Directions

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Black students' experiences of “acceptable” racism at a UK university

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freeman, L., & Stewart, H. (2021). Toward a Harm-Based Account of Microaggressions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 1008–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017099

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

18%

Researcher 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 16

70%

Social Sciences 3

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

9%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 97

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free