Examining students' perception of rural practice following an educational strategy aimed at preparing postsecondary students for rural careers: A systematic review protocol for qualitative studies

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Rural areas are widely acknowledged as being at a workforce disadvantage when compared with urban populations. One of the factors contributing to this disparity is the paucity of workforce professionals who live and practice in rural areas. Educational strategies used to train these workforce professionals may help better prepare students for rural careers and thus increase retention. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine students' perceptions of rural practice following an educational strategy used to prepare students for rural careers. Methods and analysis Searches will be conducted in the following databases: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebscohost), ERIC (Proquest), Social Services Abstracts (Proquest), PsycINFO (Proquest) and IEEE Xplore. The literature search will be limited to articles published in English in the last 20 years. Data will be extracted for author(s), year of publication (2001-2021), country of origin, research question, research design, participants, where the study takes place (eg, classroom, community), educational strategies used, theoretical approach and findings related to the research question (ie, student perceptions). Methodological validity will be assessed using standardised tools. Two independent reviewers will conduct data extraction and quality appraisal, and any disagreement will be adjudicated by discussion or with a third reviewer. Results will be presented in tabular and narrative formats. Ethics and dissemination This review does not require formal ethical approval as it does not involve direct student contact or student-identifiable data. The final systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

References Powered by Scopus

PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

19712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation

9199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

5196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Attitude toward career development in Japanese medical students: A questionnaire survey

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Button, B., Regalado, S. M., & Cameron, E. (2022, September 20). Examining students’ perception of rural practice following an educational strategy aimed at preparing postsecondary students for rural careers: A systematic review protocol for qualitative studies. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052448

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

33%

Social Sciences 2

33%

Philosophy 1

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0