Community Representatives' Involvement in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee Activities

46Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the formal roles of community representatives (CRs) in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee (CTSA) activities, to evaluate the extent of integration into the organizational and governance structures and to identify barriers to effective integration. Methods: The inventory tool was distributed to each of the 60 CTSAs using a secure web application. Results: Forty-seven (78%) completed the inventory. The mean number of CRs per CTSA is 21.4 (SD: 14.8). Most CTSAs had community advisory boards (89%) and 94% included CRs in Community Engagement (CE) cores. Only 11% reported a CR being a member of the CTSA leadership team and 19% reported that CRs advise core programs beyond CE. CRs are compensated by 79% of CTSAs. Mean annual compensation is $753 (median: $400). Compensation directly correlated with the number of hours that CRs worked in CTSA activities (r = 0.64; P = 0.001). Conclusions: This inventory allows CTSAs to better understand how CRs have engaged in activities and brings attention to the limited representation among cores and in leadership roles. CTSAs should, with substantive input from CRs, develop strategies to provide the resources and compensation necessary to better integrate the community in CTSA activities and fully realize the goals of the CTSA vision. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

35361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Central Challenges Facing the National Clinical Research Enterprise

1017Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The NIH roadmap

816Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation

216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Biological Contributions to Gender Identity and Gender Diversity: Bringing Data to the Table

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilkins, C. H., Spofford, M., Williams, N., Mckeever, C., Allen, S., Brown, J., … Strelnick, A. H. (2013). Community Representatives’ Involvement in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee Activities. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(4), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12072

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

61%

Researcher 7

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 9

43%

Psychology 5

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free