Salient values, social trust, and attitudes toward wolf management in south-western Alberta, Canada

47Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Shared values, public trust in an agency, and attitudes can influence support for successful conservation initiatives. To understand these relationships, this paper examines the role of social trust as a partial mediator between salient values similarity and attitudes toward wolves in south-western Alberta, Canada. Rural residents in this area face increasing wolf depredation on livestock. Data were obtained from a mail questionnaire (n = 566 respondents, response rate = 70%) sent to rural residents in three municipal districts in south-western Alberta. Attitudes were predicted to directly influence behavioural intention to support or oppose wolf management. Most respondents held slightly similar values as the management agency and minimally trusted the agency to effectively manage wolves. As predicted, social trust in the agency served as a partial mediator between salient value similarity and attitudes toward wolves. Salient value similarity was also a strong predictor of attitudes toward wolves. Attitudes toward wolves predicted behavioural support. Thus, social trust of the management agency can influence attitudes and management preferences concerning a species. When dealing with human-wildlife conflict, social trust should be examined to understand the context of the problem.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sponarski, C. C., Vaske, J. J., Bath, A. J., & Musiani, M. M. (2014). Salient values, social trust, and attitudes toward wolf management in south-western Alberta, Canada. Environmental Conservation, 41(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000593

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 58

62%

Researcher 30

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 37

39%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32

34%

Social Sciences 23

24%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0