Protocol for Evaluating Remote Patient Blood Pressure Monitoring Adapted to Black Women and Birthing Persons

0Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of maternal death among Black women in the United States. A large, urban hospital adopted remote patient blood pressure monitoring (RBPM) to increase blood pressure monitoring and improve the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) by reducing the time to diagnosis of HDP. The digital platform integrates with the electronic health record (EHR), automatically inputting RBPM readings to the patients’ chart; communicating elevated blood pressure values to the healthcare team; and offers a partial offset of the cost through insurance plans. It also allows for customization of the blood pressure values that prompt follow-up to the patient’s risk category. This paper describes a protocol for evaluating its impact. Objective 1 is to measure the effect of the digitally supported RBPM on the time to diagnosis of HDP. Objective 2 is to test the effect of cultural tailoring to Black participants. The ability to tailor digital content provides the opportunity to test the added value of promoting social identification with the intervention, which may help achieve equity in severe maternal morbidity events related to HDP. Evaluation of this intervention will contribute to the growing literature on digital health interventions to improve maternity care in the United States.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text
427Citations
675Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patchen, L., McCullers, A., Budd, S. G., Blumenthal, H. J., & Evans, W. D. (2024). Protocol for Evaluating Remote Patient Blood Pressure Monitoring Adapted to Black Women and Birthing Persons. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21050603

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Environmental Science 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free