Biological activity and dimerization state of modified phytochrome A proteins

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To assess potential physical interactions of type I phyA with the type II phyB-phyE phytochromes in vivo, transgenes expressing fusion gene forms of phyA were introduced into the Arabidopsis phyA mutant background. When a single c-Myc (myc) epitope is added to either the N- or C-terminus of phyA, the constructs completely complement phyA mutant phenotypes. However, addition of larger tags, such as six consecutive myc epitopes or the yellow fluorescent protein sequence, result in fusion proteins that show reduced activity. All the tagged phyA proteins migrate as dimers on native gels and co-immunoprecipitation reveals no binding interaction of phyA to any of the type II phys in the dark or under continuous far-red light. Dimers of the phyA 1–615 amino acid N-terminal photosensory domain (NphyA), generated in vivo with a yeast GAL4 dimerization domain and attached to a constitutive nuclear localization sequence, are expressed at a low level and, although they cause a cop phenotype in darkness and mediate a very low fluence response to pulses of FR, have no activity under continuous FR. It is concluded that type I phyA in its Pr form is present in plants predominantly or exclusively as a homodimer and does not stably interact with type II phys in a dimer-to-dimer manner. In addition, its activity in mediating response to continuous FR is sensitive to modification of its N- or C-terminus.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Expression and activity of the 35S:phyA-YFP transgene. (A) Diagram of the 35S:phyA-YFP transgene and immunoblot analysis of the levels of the phyA-YFP protein compared to endogenous phyA in dark-grown seedlings. Protein blots were probed with antibodies to phyA, GFP, and phyD. The anti-phyA antibody detects a degradation product (*), which is more abundant in the phyA-YFP lines than in WT, and the anti-GFP antibody detects a cross-reacting protein (**). The anti-phyD blot is a loading control. (B) Fluence response curve of the activity of phyA-YFP in the FR-HIR. Seedlings of the indicated genotypes were
  • Fig 2. Structures and expression levels of epitope-tagged phyA fusion genes. (A) Diagrams of the transgenes used in these studies and their inclusion in different transgenic lines are illustrated. (B) Immunoblot analysis of the levels of the transgene-encoded proteins compared to native phyA in the WT line in 5-day-old dark-grown seedlings. Protein blots were probed with antibodies to phyA, the c-Myc epitope, and phyD. The numbers below the anti-phyA blot lanes indicate the expression levels of transgene-encoded proteins in the transgenic lines relative to the normal wild-type phyA level, as determined by densitometry analysis in which densitometry values for the bands on the anti-phyA immunoblot were normalized to densitometry readings for bands on the anti-phyD control blot for each lane. The values for the 134 WT(phyAm1) lines include both the native phyA present in the line and the phyA-myc1 transgene product, since they migrate at the same position in the gel.
  • Fig 3. Activities of the epitope-tagged phyA proteins under continuous FR light. (A) Morphologies of seedlings of the indicated genotypes grown for one day in the dark and 4 days at 22˚C under three different fluences of continuous FR. (B) Continuous FR fluence response curves of hypocotyl length in transgenic lines expressing modified phyA proteins (means ±SE; n = 20–30).
  • Fig 4. Activities of epitope-tagged phyA proteins in regulating VLFR and extended-day flowering time. (A) Hypocotyl lengths of seedlings grown for 1 day in darkness followed by 3 days at 22˚C under FR pulses (3 min 31 μmol m-2 s-1 FR + 57 min dark) (means ±SE; n = 20–30). Asterisks indicate significant differences (*p value < 0.05) relative to the wild type plants. (B) Days to flowering under short days with low fluence FR-enriched day extension (22˚C; 8 h fluorescent light at 200 μmol m-2 s-1, 8 h incandescent light at 2 μmol m-2 s-1, 8 h dark) (means ±SE; n = 13–19). Asterisks indicate significant differences (*p value < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) relative to the wild type plants.
  • Fig 5. Native gel and co-immunoprecipitation analyses of the dimerization state of epitope-tagged phyA proteins. (A) Native gel analysis of myc1- and myc6-tagged phyA protein levels in transgenic seedlings in the WT or phyA backgrounds. Non-denatured extracts of dark-grown seedlings were fractionated on a 4–20% native PAGE gel and a blot of the gel was probed with the anti-phyA antibody. The positions at which monomeric and dimeric phyA migrate on native gels are indicated. (B) Immunoblot analysis of dark-grown seedling extracts and anti-c-Myc antibody immunoprecipitates from WT and lines expressing the indicated transgenes. The WT(phyA-m6) extract contains both native phyA and the higher molecular weight myc6-tagged phyA.
  • Fig 6. Levels of the NphyA-GAL-myc6-NLS protein in transgenic lines and the cop phenotype associated with its expression. (A) Immunoblot analysis of the levels of the NphyA-GAL and NphyB-GAL fusion proteins in dark-grown seedlings and in seedlings exposed to 8 h of R light. The NphyA-GAL protein is detected by both the anti-phyA and anti-c-Myc Abs in the #116 lines, and the NphyB-GAL protein is detected by the anti-c-Myc Ab in the #92 lines. Native phyA is detected by the anti-phyA Ab in the phyB(NphyB-GAL) #92 lines, and the phyA-myc6 protein is detected by both the anti-phyA and anti-c-Myc Abs in the phyA(phyAm6) #137 lines. The signal for the NphyA-GAL protein in the #116 lines under 8h R was barely visible on the blot probed with the anti-phyA Ab on this exposure (*) but was detected on longer exposures. The anti-phyD immunoblot is a loading control. (B) Phenotypes of seedlings of the indicated genotypes grown in darkness or

References Powered by Scopus

Phytochrome structure and signaling mechanisms

902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of transcription factor HY5 genomic binding sites revealed its hierarchical role in light regulation of development

779Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phytochrome functions in Arabidopsis development

663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Two molecular species of phytochrome A with distinct modes of action

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generation of High-Value Genomic Resource in Rice: A “Subgenomic Library” of Low-Light Tolerant Rice Cultivar Swarnaprabha

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, P., & Sharrock, R. A. (2017). Biological activity and dimerization state of modified phytochrome A proteins. PLoS ONE, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186468

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

81%

Researcher 3

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

53%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

35%

Physics and Astronomy 1

6%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0