Analyzing recommendations interactions in clinical guidelines: Impact of action type hierarchies and causation beliefs

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accounting for patients with multiple health conditions is a complex task that requires analysing potential interactions among recommendations meant to address each condition. Although some approaches have been proposed to address this issue, important features still require more investigation, such as (re)usability and scalability. To this end, this paper presents an approach that relies on reusable rules for detecting interactions among recommendations coming from various guidelines. It extends previously proposed models by introducing the notions of action type hierarchy and causation beliefs, and provides a systematic analysis of relevant interactions in the context of multimorbidity. Finally, the approach is assessed based on a case-study taken from the literature to highlight the added value of the approach.

References Powered by Scopus

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence-based drug-herbal interactions

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rule-based combination of comorbid treatments for chronic diseases applied to hypertension, diabetes mellitus and heart failure

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analyzing interactions on combining multiple clinical guidelines

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inferring recommendation interactions in clinical guidelines

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalizing the detection of internal and external interactions in clinical guidelines

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zamborlini, V., da Silveira, M., Pruski, C., ten Teije, A., & van Harmelen, F. (2015). Analyzing recommendations interactions in clinical guidelines: Impact of action type hierarchies and causation beliefs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9105, pp. 317–326). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_40

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

38%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Researcher 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

63%

Philosophy 1

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free